Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
fleur
fleur
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 52
    • Issues 52
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • fleur
  • fleurfleur
  • Issues
  • #214

Closed
Open
Opened Oct 19, 2018 by Jens Bröder@broederDeveloper

test timing reference.

The developers have a feeling for the individual test run times, the user does not. Sometimes I have the impression the tests are very slow for some reason, maybe because something with my compilation is not optimal.

Small suggestion:

In the test output, provide the timing for a 'standard desktop computer of ours, or ever for the usual machines' behind the runtime of the test. If the test runtime is much larger then this 'benchmark' on a 'performance' resource, something might be fishy, or one has compiled with gfortran instead of intel. Also it might help developers to track the evolution of the tests duration a bit better, because the timings are in the git.

I am not sure if this is a good idea through.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: fleur/fleur#214